all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Showing end of buffer
Date: 20 Jan 2004 01:41:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hdyrqwnz.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040119214259.GA25875@fencepost>

Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:42:25PM +0100, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> > I makes sense to put the beginning indicator on the left and the end
> > indicator on the right, in a way.  But somehow I expected both to be
> > on the left.
> > 
> > What do people think?
> 
> I agree that it sort of `makes sense', but one thing I do find annoying is
> that the _up_ indicator switches between left and right depending on whether
> it's `beginning of file' or an up-arrow.  I think it would makes sense to put
> the up-arrow also on the right; 

The arrow is already on the right -- do you suggest moving the up
arrow to the left side?

>                                 I find glancing at those indicators when
> scrolling, and putting them in the same spot would make my glancing a lot
> easier... :-)
> 
> Another small issue is that I'd like the arrows to be even more distinct from
> the bof/eof indicators than they are now, to make quick recognition easier;
> perhaps just adding a another row  of pixels to the vertical line inthe
> bof/eof indicators would do th job.

But I deliberately didn't want to make them too visible  --  it's nice they are
there, but they are a bit on the noisy side in some cases.

In any case, I have plans to make the bitmaps customizable (in lisp), so
eventually you will be able to make them any way you like...

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-21  0:59 Showing end of buffer Richard Stallman
2003-04-21  1:57 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-21  6:05   ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-04-21  8:46     ` Miles Bader
2003-04-21  9:37       ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-04-23  1:00       ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-23  1:35         ` Miles Bader
2004-01-16 20:03       ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-16 23:12         ` Michael Welsh Duggan
2004-01-17  0:33         ` Kevin Rodgers
2004-01-17  1:29           ` Miles Bader
2004-01-17  1:48           ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-19 18:27         ` Glenn Morris
2004-01-19 23:51           ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-19 20:42         ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-01-19 21:42           ` Miles Bader
2004-01-20  0:41             ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2004-01-19 23:59               ` David Kastrup
2004-01-20  9:42                 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-01-20  2:22               ` Miles Bader
2004-01-20 10:43                 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-19 21:55           ` Robert J. Chassell
2004-01-19 23:48           ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-20  7:47             ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-01-20 15:31           ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-20 22:39             ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-21  4:25               ` David Kastrup
2004-01-21 21:09               ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-22  4:55                 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
2004-01-23 18:24                   ` Richard Stallman
2004-01-24  0:12                     ` Kim F. Storm
2004-02-17 23:28             ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-22 19:04         ` Peter Lee
2003-04-21 10:05     ` Kai Großjohann
2003-04-21 11:03       ` Karl Eichwalder
2003-04-21 12:01     ` Simon Josefsson
2003-04-21 13:28     ` Stefan Monnier
2003-04-21  7:30 ` Werner LEMBERG
2004-01-22 18:11 ` Sam Steingold
2004-01-22 21:25   ` Miles Bader
2004-01-22 21:41     ` Sam Steingold
2004-01-22 22:03       ` Miles Bader
2004-01-23  0:07       ` Kim F. Storm
2004-01-23 10:31         ` Gaute B Strokkenes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3hdyrqwnz.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk \
    --to=storm@cua.dk \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=kai@emptydomain.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.