From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New .texi file Date: 14 Jun 2004 09:39:40 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200406130118.i5D1I9817614@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200406140306.i5E36KQ29367@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087198802 10849 80.91.224.253 (14 Jun 2004 07:40:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:39:54 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZm4Q-0001BE-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:39:54 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZm4P-0000Hn-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:39:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZm5I-0002ix-J0 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZm5A-0002ir-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZm58-0002iA-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZm58-0002hu-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZm3w-0002dm-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:39:24 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 82302 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2004 07:39:22 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2004 07:39:22 -0000 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200406140306.i5E36KQ29367@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Original-Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24947 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24947 Luc Teirlinck writes: > Kim F. Storm wrote: > > > ===File ~/emacs-x.texi====================================== > > > Very nice, except for the name -- > IMO, it can easily be confused with xemacs or emacs on X. > > emacs-xtra.texi would be better. > > Those are 15 characters. I do not know whether we still care about > the 14 character limit. We don't. The only limit we care about is that 8.3 limit on MS-DOG doesn't cause duplicate file names. Since emacs-xt.tex is still unique in that context, it is ok. > Certain existing files seem to violate it. > ("maintaining.texi" has 16 and that is just one example from several). > > What about emacs-+.texi? I dislike it even more... emacs-xtra.texi or emacs-extra.texi will do fine! -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk