From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: puzzle.el. Date: 21 Jul 2004 23:31:51 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87llhizw3g.fsf@dugong.chemistry.nottingham.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1090445513 11953 80.91.224.253 (21 Jul 2004 21:31:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: matt@stchem.bham.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 21 23:31:36 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BnOga-0007Pn-00 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:31:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BnOjN-0003Qc-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BnOjH-0003QX-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BnOjG-0003QL-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BnOjG-0003QI-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:34:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BnOgC-0000xg-JR; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id CFBDC47FEA8; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25868 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25868 Richard Stallman writes: > For example, if the smallest font is 10x10 and your window is 600x800, you will get a glyph matrix of approx 60x80. > Now, if you use a sliced image (or just many images which are less than 10x10 in size, you can easily fill the > window with more than those 60x80 glyphs. > > Maybe redisplay should notice when it encounters a glyph below > the size that was used for the calculation of the glyph matrix, > and enlarge the glyph matrix at that point. It is simpler to increase the matrix size when we try to exceed the current size. I have just installed (fairly simple) changes to accomplish that. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk