From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EMACS_INT cleanup Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:24:50 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <83aan8uvy3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrqc2ou9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285273534 22199 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2010 20:25:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:25:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 22:25:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OysMB-0003nY-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:25:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53581 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OysM9-0005F2-Kr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:25:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42457 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OysLr-000588-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OysLm-000813-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OysLm-00080v-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OysLi-0003WC-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:24:58 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:24:58 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:24:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEXh29ZPQDwYDQn+/v6H eHITCAYlGBMj8X5VAAACX0lEQVQ4jV2Tza7bIBCFcbHu2kSIvUeBNVGirqFGXvei4nVANu//CJ3B P1GLF1H8yXPOzBzY8zjW1yyEO/8+2fHbq1pKrVX+B7paAI8p1V3AWs77WkGnmGIEM3HGGEfAmeUz QMKj8Yl3BJzvpV5YZUspgo4JVs4tPzRmDUUhLICgTJe4xZd5VRUBRID3BV4FjPRz85U05Av02EAI qjnW6JmfoCtZBa9QIaYE0UwHsL7gMKQvOpKGhuEDRmWEaBp05AlEBXzQFc2EAP8Ag/Mj5X+BqtqQ JzkTiFqwA8wQsVTJobQvdOYXaDVWBQk7hDjyyxVpyL5C85taIw1UnQNjquljj4s7Ove/YODPTggc psa1xOEcicq4NBE8ecWxRHlON7sn86tTphjcSIrrOd1gg8iyV/lmSKTZIuCYrcKHR8bR7yLT7opZ JtzD/VwpLPg6paEBxq1z/DF9DQg2Skt6H2F4SRaU/BoodpHA/QD9+qpl6ORsiiaNtJ4A+izda6UI NfX7EbhOy146K26wV0rLsOfqR/o9r87O2F/aT5wauKU/vevZrI3JgnzFbWyzqjhpxzANOXgcpU7f ReE1YMFDfQfaXyAgq07LQp2Hrqg8l7isoZG55iAJ4L0Zi9oAc4oHLyLGpKeLw624z0rp1Yf2ybBv kKOMzx6lg9yBtPs+OO0QUzK2D4LPgl+3lmFC9kpeiqzcBSyuyLRKQqKr6XPPcbpyB0Lk2/ABXR2D 382Kent/SikI4ehC5e1+AMb9dqe3rVYd0/eREuZrwle9IFeqLGdKnj062bJUgirVtLWU/AWqdO1p ZOxJBwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Cat Power's _Dark End of the Street_: "It Ain't Fair" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yuuusr8BdZQ3I8cGksCtnqdDyPM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130692 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >> I mean, it sounds nonsensical, but 1) it makes it compile without any >> other warnings, and 2) if you've said (setq a (buffer-string)) on a >> big buffer and then happen to (intern a), you don't want a segfault, >> do you? > > It might distract you enough as to not make your getaway before the > memory bloat police arrives and catches you red-black-handed. Yeah, and then if you unintern nil, and then rm -rf /, then you're really in trouble. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen