From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Single process output reading Date: 19 Aug 2004 13:40:33 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <874qn35tgf.fsf@zamazal.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092915631 15952 80.91.224.253 (19 Aug 2004 11:40:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Milan Zamazal , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 19 13:40:13 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BxlHB-0002E4-00 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:40:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxlLR-0002j9-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BxlLL-0002j4-B5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BxlLJ-0002ij-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxlLJ-0002iZ-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:44:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxlGd-0003m4-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 43168 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2004 11:39:38 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2004 11:39:38 -0000 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26314 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26314 Richard Stallman writes: > IMO a better way would be to allow restricting accept-process-output to > just a single process output reading. Then the speech output system, > aware of possible consequences of advising 'message' etc., could invoke > accept-process-output in the restricted form, without the danger of > unwanted side effects. > > I think it would be reasonable to provide a way to tell > wait_reading_process_output to ignore certain processes and read from > certain other processes. I worry about the idea of not running timers, > though, and that seems unnecessary for what you need. I think it > would be better to implement the feature so that timers do run. > > I think it would be better to clean up the calling conventions > of wait_reading_process_output rather than try to squeeze everything > into the existing argumemts. I can do that. Should I rename wait_reading_process_input to wait_reading_process_output ? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk