From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4951: 23.1.50; browse-url-default-windows-browser bug + patch Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:18:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87skaoqmeh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315718581 711 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 05:23:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4951@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 07:22:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cVL-0005Pb-29 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:22:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33406 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cVK-00036j-Dv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:22:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cVH-00036F-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cVF-0001me-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:22:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cVE-0001ma-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cZK-00027P-I6; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 4951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4951.13157187818089 (code B ref 4951); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 05:26:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cYf-00026L-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:26:21 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cYc-00026C-H0 for 4951@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2cUQ-0002X8-5N; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:21:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87skaoqmeh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:31:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Mia Doi Todd's _Cosmic Ocean Ship_: "Skipping Stones" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2cUQ-0002X8-5N MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316323318.38419@6W0lWGzOHqdNvujtQa8Yzg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:27:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50858 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: >> 2) Changing the verb to w32-shell-execute (ShellExecute) from "open" >> to nil is for some reason I do not know necessary. The answer to why >> hides deep within the w32 registry and maybe some knowledgeable >> persons at MS... It might be a mismatch of some kind, I don't know. > > Is this still necessary? More information was requested a year and a half ago, and was not followed up on, so I'm closing this bug. Please reopen if it turns out that this is still necessary. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/