From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gdb-ui Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:20:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17422.38246.980642.602542@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17423.12162.607433.102530@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17423.19282.313048.593168@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141892836 15956 80.91.229.2 (9 Mar 2006 08:27:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 09 09:27:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHGUD-0007Mp-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:27:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHGUC-0006Gt-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHGTm-00069j-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:26:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHGPe-0004mu-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:22:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHGPP-0004iR-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:22:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FHGSI-0006OD-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 11F65A50021; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:21:53 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17423.19282.313048.593168@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:23:30 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51401 Archived-At: Nick Roberts writes: > It's a bit harder to type. Unlike C-return for CUA-mode, it would only be a > local binding (to the GUD buffer). True. Other modes also bind M-return for their own purposes, so I guess you can safely use M-return in *gud* buffers. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk