From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:30:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878t8lfgu3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87y3gkafex.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87vabo2dp7.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87h8n73nkb.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526466513 3165 195.159.176.226 (16 May 2018 10:28:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:28:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 12:28:29 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fItfY-0000jX-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 12:28:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIthf-00039W-O9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43195) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIthZ-00038q-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIthW-0006fS-6T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIthV-0006b5-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIthQ-0002KC-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 12:30:26 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEWqvOIpMm9qjcxBXK1U dsGFP5ahAAACUElEQVQ4jVWU7cGrIAyFIzpAIw5AIwOIyQAK2X+me9Da2xd/tOYhHxwSSaS5S5Ig kt3NhT6rZhURSkGKOJ70ANM9hf6WppCJjsdOqtsW6AYy/QDmPYepg3EESD8gTunKmIZK6QMQnJk3 6R7kAweAK2OQDuYQ8Ep1KB2gcNg7eM34ewSSqU4JZb8R4gKwIwClI9cBUd5ry/MFYjMZd0+H7hO2 cJDRpPYcUVszy6oVISSKvNXtA/RaniHYnP1U978ABKA1bR+Pex3Bsq+ztzNq6YA/AGfM8l68FVW+ wE12lFql7K4lPiDeDlCuxNy0MJevh20dTIqLA1iu5Bzd1a+bEKmOXbyud3LcukBV6I8WUG1z7aHi DXAn0zHBV63UNdKdwbEq7gqN0tQ4n4Vi6SVZAzuEwLEvCr/psqshOzwoe+NYFltOeHyEMj1yWv2M ADoX0v8LBTsA8+IAEVu/djKE4mjZEApl44lFca3F3KHHIrbSozkrJYa9sZY577+gbZcdd7G45Qfg OGXv58SJeMkVXfIBrBxjF8CVzX4AxDbr9lbYe/vEJwWODrPkxssKFR9QFO6OxnKOuZT9m7w7QPrV 0JYQfG9PDjXpEli/Vyxj0rgRZlZpxTgdJfCZ5MWNe6hxpE2nQJgSDQEbNj65h7rA2GeHONM2kkSO dGrsoI3X6MU+Z2mA9PR+QvXZmdbxlegYUAANAOsNkKO80zbRzOWPR6AXmmubwguSIoeOqQbrn4Ze d/95aekNp+t1PqgRri9BG2YISc/cVIFYKRy0SnGc/R90jJa04Or2dwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: <87h8n73nkb.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Wed, 16 May 2018 12:24:52 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225337 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: > They are embedded (here is an example), the question is with changing > the setting to gnus-block-private-groups, am I safe? Yes, you're safe when reading email. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no