From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117274: * emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (cl-macrolet): Avoid excessive progn's. Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 07:03:22 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402009441 9880 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2014 23:04:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 23:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 06 01:03:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsghJ-00023k-8Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 01:03:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44153 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsghI-00055r-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsgh7-00055S-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsggy-0006rW-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]:48241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wsggy-0006qe-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z10so1708067pdj.40 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=DfoqDcVhYZPo1/vgJmeDWrY4kN/rF3gVe62pWC9cVQI=; b=vESs8xGWvxBFn5msPUcrb82UD+xXZQ/eBTTlqTgVvnuq80rf2++cGS3rUdKVL79TOH xyBqKQyxAgG8ATWfoC7ipdhXCzhvoMfwVORvXKtm7h4YyG1IqitU0XovuHgCkeH3GXI2 Ry3lNjx+UrJcFZjD1S3/YgJc6x5jmNAHZOJG6W2CQ96UuW9DOMvBwlH3pJsjGoe0Cq/f Mxt47nAsR0dcKSp8o9GFBpFGYOf7rhyw8pXNjWvYhS9Ork9myfYt7tmDBKWZmkBQaUyQ 6NSvng927Y9Qxmm7PHgFZmTHQiLtw6/bglL4B/V56xmP3FQv61JX2RzIphBKKKGOuKwF erIw== X-Received: by 10.68.133.7 with SMTP id oy7mr1324402pbb.43.1402009407346; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from fortuna ([123.115.245.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qq5sm27666612pbb.24.2014.06.05.16.03.25 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACkAAAApAQAAAACAGz1bAAABKElEQVQYlWNg3NIt5FDPUPt7 4+X79Qyucz5/ugik+L2PBgKpyphaIK921q23QDnG0NBQoMr/vaWl9f8ZLL78uPv5PwN7RETfzXoG jhmFz27XM0RXmpuY/WfY+fv0Mc56BvFybfXA/wwL5t/wF61n2PU59axXPcOVzbmSW/8zrNt1benC /ww70hqUU/4zKCtrT9jwn8FhwynbufUMendE2aLqGRpdX9al1zM8eh17lKeeQcTMrdD5P8P3j/YT Q/8zXHSb7p1Qz/C4OM2JuZ7hgtI7K6AjqsMnf8j4z8C6xG1tw3+GqpqvsVn/GTzmpD9j/8/wP/oZ S/l/Bka+QO/g/wy15ueeFQL9N1O8mPU/g+umV3t1gdT0/1bTgHLqYVeXAlWKpMWt+w8Az82C9nHf X0cAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:02:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (CentOS 6.5) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172378 Archived-At: On 2014-06-05 17:02 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > This is called macroexp-progn. Knew about this but forgot. > And instead of > > (let ((foo (lambda ...))) > ... (funcall foo body) ... > ... (funcall foo body) ...) > > better do > > (let ((body-exp ...)) > ... body-exp ... > ... body-exp ...) Was too tired last night :( Thanks for pointing this out. Leo