From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs: are multi-char parentheses possible? Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:22:48 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402393231 30440 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2014 09:40:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 10 11:40:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WuIXW-0000ua-LD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:40:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37857 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuIXW-0000yb-6y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuIGq-0002IW-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuIGh-0003BG-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]:53898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WuIGh-0003B5-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rq2so5983749pbb.5 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=QJuLBjuezHXcBdUAoed+/AocQgY0y8cha6F2iBK8Ces=; b=pn1/wlMBvQBi7aVXnd2v8n2ogYkIOGRXgrmpFvCSUmKCUjDEq70cw4YSrhtkK5qeOW MmwYBpkXvKIn931ZSG71kJelsuOr0RPvry5x9KJS5omJhggHh1gYrJux+gBKIUhFxfCe pwsF/ZMbQfAcQO3x2WGfifyKTF+j/qAr+p9Sy0O2D0Eb5jCZBjZZ7B/m87Q4EKG3X1Un x1ny1irT1WXzedcnyUIEVIZvAXvCEmiPwGfKATlFTYDaR4FqFI97m/t1jtLJ9VNJtaY2 nldyT80+3exrd8KgiH19NxEMu1fv3a2Wx6Mym6K1G6F7E2fUQ+hBzd0D/1oAwsbt/47I oUhg== X-Received: by 10.68.245.162 with SMTP id xp2mr10572551pbc.69.1402392178110; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from fortuna ([123.115.245.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iv2sm68425546pbc.19.2014.06.10.02.22.55 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:21:44 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (CentOS 6.5) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172434 Archived-At: On 2014-06-09 22:21 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Maybe you "did something wrong" there, but SMIE normally tries to obey > the existing syntax tables (and syntax-table properties), so maybe you > saw a bug in SMIE. hmm, I can no longer find a recipe to reproduce the problem I was seeing where forward-sexp before << moved forward just one char. BTW, some languages have structured documentation embedded in comments, for example, texinfo used by octave, or xml-like by misc other languages. What is the best way to provide in-comment indentation for them? Is this something SMIE might support in future? Thanks, Leo