From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Hanchrow Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UP and DOWN with multi-line minibuffer history Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 22:47:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83wpsj6978.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449960624 21441 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2015 22:50:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 12 23:50:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7szV-0003MS-SY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 23:50:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53246 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7szV-0004c9-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7szS-0004af-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7szO-0002VA-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7szO-0002Se-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7szM-0002y7-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 23:50:04 +0100 Original-Received: from ec2-52-8-12-207.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.8.12.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 23:50:04 +0100 Original-Received: from eric.hanchrow by ec2-52-8-12-207.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 23:50:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 7 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ec2-52-8-12-207.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:o6aJLFFcuf51OoP3QrPjzyjBvKs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196176 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think it would be more consistent, including with how > line-move-visual behaves in normal buffers, if UP ended up in the last > line of the previous item. WDYT? Sounds good to me, too.