From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time for 23.0.70? Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:25:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202434175 4809 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 01:29:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 02:29:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNI3x-0001CS-1V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:29:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNI3U-0008Fs-Cn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNI3R-0008Fn-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNI3M-0008FP-L0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:29:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNI3M-0008FF-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:29:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.135]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNI3F-0000oa-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:29:20 -0500 X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]:54524) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1JNI3B-0006wl-Gn (Exim 4.67) (return-path ); Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:29:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:10:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130000 Emacs/23.0.60 (20080205) Fedora 8 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88479 Archived-At: On 2008-02-08 01:10 +0000, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Is it time to bump emacs-version to 23.0.70? Or .65? Then we can >>> distinguish old unicode-2 branch builds from the current trunk. >> Agree. > > Why would we care? What we now call the trunk was called the unicode > branch before. But trunk and unicode branch is not in sync any more and they have the same version number. > > > Stefan -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :. Use the best OS -- http://www.fedoraproject.org/