From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:54:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282236953 12975 80.91.229.12 (19 Aug 2010 16:55:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 19 18:55:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Om8P9-00060M-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:55:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40315 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Om8P8-0005GC-CX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:55:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37267 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Om8NU-0004V1-Sq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Om8NT-0004qo-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:36554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Om8NS-0004qB-0y; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A571C005C6; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:54:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hase.home (ppp-93-104-135-151.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.135.151]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE041C00276; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:54:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Concentrate on th'cute, li'l CARTOON GUYS! Remember the SERIAL NUMBERS!! Follow the WHIPPLE AVE EXIT!! Have a FREE PEPSI!! Turn LEFT at th'HOLIDAY INN!! JOIN the CREDIT WORLD!! MAKE me an OFFER!!! In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:26:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128880 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:52:53 +0200 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Stefan Monnier writes: >> >> > If that's indeed the culprit, I think it's a misfeature of Bzr, but at >> > least we can workaround it by using "bzr commit -m <...>", which I would >> > then *strongly* recommend. >> >> Even better: use an unbound branch. > > How would this help? No matter what you do in an unbound branch, you > eventually need to push or merge, at which time you will have the same > problem. What am I missing? It won't improve the actual transfer of the commits, but it lets you review before you push. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."