From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 0643952: Add documentation to ecomplete.el Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:12:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20180117105626.27351.89699@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180117105628.5272622EE4@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87bmhrtpa8.fsf@gmx.de> <873733h182.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516273921 27369 195.159.176.226 (18 Jan 2018 11:12:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:12:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 12:11:56 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ec86Y-0005bx-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:11:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec88Y-0002vD-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:13:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec87x-0002ui-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec87r-0002vv-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:13:00 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:57592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec87r-0002rJ-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:12:55 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.209.240.67.getinternet.no ([84.209.240.67] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ec87n-0007vD-9F; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:12:53 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVVXV0xMzQjmaVCjZF/ w8kmm6ZRSz/3AAACZUlEQVQ4jU2Uy3LjIBBFUYj2EFf2MhJ7AtI+M4Y908D//8rcbpSqYFfZ7mP6 eVtK/ZyUxkgBH+crJbX8mPU15LSgU/oFYCe8cPK3/g3aBSuDnl9Kw+MN9DbIkwfrpXS2TKDXNjwA DZdLzt8/QKeYcMMNN46cc883MCnE1TnnyaUOkEsVYHWr/iIC2Fe25zEYLBbp7RduDFevMgRUAGt0 vPYBQC70XPBGmQy0brEBeLdr/Lt0LnOxAOtOyfHZr9xHFlCtMuEKAsidJ1JlTzeIyXG2xJ5Qn4Bm 1UON1TNw//SdLDqjF27HukcB5szTE20rgxq3KIVrzwC9JAVXqgEQx4b535nRtNF1xY2txsBVPI01 1maNgfVLBbVugST2h7X2oQom719aNUWbkhBOAdhMjzGOEjRAeFSEcM8ng/P5CU+du0XLKg35Yrt9 W8zw6IpvathdQlghn18hHqWQa6o9whs3MPxhsJoa+yj4rZIyHDsdLwb+o0aUwgCiBNhjz4u1H/SZ jpLZg1KV604O3Vge6N7Vy1+ADWLe8RkPkYdvhvLB2VeoNomnKp2tqy9Dslf6jUNQrnMUrNEJzBUh Ay8KBHC5sye3QId8g0Nw+kSjiy4AAmctQ8VIHHZBAMuHNZXfASBGcmJ3AeCBr/B05sLjcpOw4Ax0 y7rsqMv7QjMEgF3JsTY4KPk8picGhg6ujVgoXYBXE6y8LgwwI6muYWt40vpOloFcCLw4AIY3Esn6 +0ZQc6NAsEic7OBC2NHcQXZ2oUN+yILu3zdYJkGEwT2ZdllnIe/8kEFD0rTPB4AQdSZ+Iilzg/8f IcQ6vO6uVgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: <873733h182.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:10:05 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222070 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > For the time being I would be happy if the lambdas were transferred into > functions, and if and were bound to the functions in > parallel to M-n and M-p. The lambdas work on the locally bound variables, so I've been staring at that code for a couple of minutes to decide whether there's a trivial fix here, and I don't quite see it. > Still hard-coded, yes. But you could postpone to customize it until > there is further pressure from somebody else :-) But, yes, I could just bind up/down to the same lambdas, and I think I'll just do that immediately and further customisation can be left as a future exercise. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no