From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes to emacs/src/ChangeLog Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147077884 7490 80.91.229.2 (8 May 2006 08:44:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 10:44:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd1M5-00010K-SX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 10:44:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd1M5-0000ZK-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd1LW-0000Yh-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd1LV-0000Xq-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:44:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd1LU-0000Xc-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:44:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fd1MH-0000Y2-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id CC3438A0042; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Mon, 08 May 2006 10:28:16 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54069 Archived-At: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu writes: > Actually I thought about that, but didn't do so because the Graphic > Control Extension block labeled with 0xf9 has other kinds of > information and they cannot be emulated directly. Do you think it is > OK to drop them? Yes. IMO, it is better to simulate what you can, rather than using a completely different format. I don't know what to put there, but in a GIF I have here, the first byte is 9 and the fourth byte is 63. Perhaps it is better to just put 0 there, to indicate that the value is unknown. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk