From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Package Management Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:13:49 -0600 Message-ID: References: <485b0c380808011427n4d3144eey3f8daf3abac83bf4@mail.gmail.com> <87ej589vku.fsf@hagelb.org> <48939B72.8040306@gmail.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217636067 7029 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2008 00:14:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Phil Hagelberg , Stephen Eilert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 02 02:15:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KP4mA-0000lR-3d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:15:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41051 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KP4lF-0006eS-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KP4ks-0006MH-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KP4kr-0006Li-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55029 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KP4kr-0006LZ-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:38683) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KP4kr-0008Hi-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m720DpWF006894; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m720DoNv028624; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-95.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.95]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m720Doaf023791; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B336D88808D; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:13:49 -0600 (MDT) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <48939B72.8040306@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat\, 02 Aug 2008 01\:25\:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101932 Archived-At: >>>>> "Lennart" == Lennart Borgman (gmail) writes: Lennart> And the barrier would be even lower if ELPA had an uninstall Lennart> command. Or, maybe I should say that it would be lower for me if I Lennart> knew the name of the uninstall command in ELPA? You can delete a package from the package menu using 'd'. I don't think package.el can uninstall itself atm, though I forget. Tom