From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Annoying window/frame-configuration registers Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:52:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4D91998C.5010307@gmx.at> <4D91AC1C.6080906@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301396025 25137 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2011 10:53:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 12:53:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4WYJ-0008O2-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:53:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4WY3-0003Tn-RT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47324 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4WXw-0003T2-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4WXl-0004Nu-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from batman.blixtvik.net ([87.96.254.3]:40821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4WXl-0004NQ-43 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:53:01 -0400 Original-Received: from www.verona.se (10-208-96-87.cust.blixtvik.se [87.96.208.10]) by batman.blixtvik.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7897F8A6E; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:52:58 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from chopper (unknown [192.168.201.6]) by www.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE396A1CBF5; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:52:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4D91AC1C.6080906@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:53:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 87.96.254.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137841 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Whats lacking to get the branch merged to trunk? > > Testers. So far Juanma was the only one to help here. Cool, I can start to use the branch then. Would simply using the branch in daily work be enough of a test? I still have the original use case that we did the "window group" patch for. Does your branch cover the case of having multiple window groups and pinnable windows? > > martin > > PS: Some changes in the `display-buffer' department are guaranteed to > break existing code. Are clients supposed to adopt or the other way around? -- Joakim Verona