From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r106464: Fix asynchrounous GnuTLS socket handling on some versions of the GnuTLS library. Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:34:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321907676 740 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2011 20:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 21:34:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaZT-0005LO-D2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:34:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39177 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaZS-0003nO-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaZN-0003n1-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:34:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaZH-00059v-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:34:25 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:50938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaZH-00059b-Ce for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaZ7-0001Dr-44; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:34:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:27:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEWGgIgzLzYdGR24tLhP S1NybHWl6QQRAAACWUlEQVQ4jXXTsXLcIBAG4FUQ/aGgXjByzxirBxn6RQfv/yr5QefEKUxxw9wn FnZhyf8w6Ec45PHx8XE4/3EcRIS5/+QnCXq3xhhrrS/9V70bMy+Y/P45VGN3zySGOJip9VFJrY2p j5pKDOVNNxWV0opU5g5SJsADkFOCKEqBuUlASVWvZdd5vSFy43aHymsoWmWtI6IB8HmHlMNbmF6Q IqWxsyDKOWxhWrE5xgt4AIeNO2itVIyUB3ghAW88ZUDCkkhhhHIekDcuX5A6SBIdKG2hZNViHMAd vHNzpvqgGgboF4gODSAq668ViE8dipTTP9AJB3UsvDgKyWn1gBzvzYVz7AGV5in7xCrHGgd46iAH UIezxB4K/+EWBWUxlwYw+SoqApyYcVqPChxXI9VMPuu9uZi9Pzw9SJ5EWt6gNL7+AjrJabnnkQfA jzQkSpOcGyuiMWPFEwcDuOfyHzj39P55zOzZkts7nMYs/4DEN7CAXlv/pMlRM3Tsd6gOIw3B1VHd mzR1TwMUEeAQjDLPu5xVNWmEAjSBNDjQMb0BiknLC1B06fgB2OSsOyw3BMAhP0n+2uSkL5Ps8ncF H0hcXv1ZXaba3jgdvGc5M2q48a+/YMYTCXJy3M6Vrw5mMcsA50KIxHlp4VpPZKLsDSRz0NTWDvlU VQOMIfTGnNvWpLYtnKgH3ggOrNCcVOq81VlbGWJevkEr7Xq0K9qGJ2IBS++Q3ry1nTlf0dRmmkU7 LXjvS4fUltZvoaK4Vp+4vgpIgGprtudeZ1MAeAmlQ606mpjMuaOfrxdE9Qfip7cgOsEvegAAAABJ RU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Tarwater's _Inside the Ships_: "Do the Oz" X-MailScanner-ID: 1RSaZ7-0001Dr-44 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1322512449.48341@EhFsqlBEme4l3cBg1aihkw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146120 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Also if the code could be conditionalized on the problematic gnutls > version (or at least include a comment explaining which gnutls versions > are affected or a link to a gnutls bug-report about it, or something) > that would be *really* handy, so that 10 years from now we can decide > whether it can be removed. The version I'm seeing the problem with is with 2.12.14-3 (Debian wheezy). I'll add a comment about that. I can try to add some autoconf logic, too, but my autoconf-fu is weak. (And I don't really know what the range of affected versions are...) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/