From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:58:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zjxxn6th.fsf@gmx.de> <87hajqpjn1.fsf@gmx.de> <87a9pfpexw.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365019443 18137 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 20:04:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 20:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 22:04:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTv4-000253-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:04:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTuf-0004UY-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTuc-0004T1-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTub-0004Iq-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]:56233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTub-0004If-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id EF96E400C2; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 20:03:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1365019410; bh=vjOMistx2FPu8M6INFK4A+441ltmKUeHEBH4g9xhX8o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BYumOIZhNjKPDDoB3PDLJD/ziHvA01Ss8h4jMiKResA3XMUJutoG2pzhe+fCphGt1 0XmkyfuHC3fDAqGoTKhCwq3BJkBv2LSs+7hEPZh9pRznlKCRTJvkurWXEq82GiSFN1 zmEBe9SxhP9Z0jMGll9DcjZrR1k00bNnUHMQ2rTE= Original-Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 39B9860024; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87a9pfpexw.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:55:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Copyright: Copyright 2013 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 23 X-Hashcash: 1:28:130403:michael.albinus@gmx.de::wgf5KVn4dQj/uh47:00000000000000000000000000000000000000Z5Eyk X-Hashcash: 1:28:130403:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca::2N+9AIKiFYFcf1gz:000000000000000000000000000000000000Hd5Op X-Hashcash: 1:28:130403:emacs-devel@gnu.org::SuqQb4tC5brO23Yb:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000y8g5A X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 207.210.242.212 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158625 Archived-At: >>>>> "MA" == Michael Albinus writes: >> Inotify(7) support is welcome even on headless systems. MA> It shall be configurable. Glib's implementation might the primary MA> choice, pure inotify the second choice, and none of them the third MA> one. Except systems which use w32notify, of course. That works. MA> I will also think about a unified Lisp interface for the different file MA> notification implementations. That also is welcome. MA> And of course, respective file name handlers and there needs shall not MA> be forgotten. Thanks, -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6