From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Version 22.1.100 in Emacs Lisp Intro?? Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:38:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8764dsy6ic.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162845604 8276 80.91.229.2 (6 Nov 2006 20:40:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 06 21:40:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhBG0-00034F-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:39:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhBG0-0003L9-F9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GhBFo-0003It-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:39:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GhBFm-0003FO-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:39:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhBFm-0003FH-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GhBFm-0000bj-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:39:34 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx19.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 334C78A004B; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:39:26 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <8764dsy6ic.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon\, 06 Nov 2006 09\:49\:47 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61875 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >> The following change triggered some thoughs: >> >> +2006-11-04 Robert J. Chassell >> + >> + * emacs-lisp-intro.texi: Replace 22.0.100 with 22.1.100. >> >> Since we use 22.0.50 for the CVS version, 22.0.90,... for pretests, >> it seems quite non-intuitive for Emacs Lisp Intro to use 22.1.100 >> in an introductionary text. >> >> Since most users will get a version 22.1.1 when then they build Emacs >> from the tarball, it would IMO make more sense to use 22.1.1 in the >> examples. > > We could update the `set-version' command in admin/admin.el, so that > the Lispintro version number is automatically bumped each time a new > pretest is rolled. (The Emacs and Emacs Lisp manuals are already > being bumped in this way.) IMO the lisp intro should say 22.1 in the examples. So I don't see a need to do as you suggest. The version number in file names used in the intro is of the form MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD In contrast, the CVS / pretest versions uses MAJOR.MINOR.MICRO.BUILD So 22.1.100 refers to build number 100 of 22.1 Bob already changes the intro to use a 22.1.1 (ie build number 1) instead, and that's all that's needed. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk