From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:10:42 -0700 Message-ID: References: <17EA38DF-BCC1-4565-8510-5DD10DD667E3@mac.com> <20071229114551.GD9794@thyrsus.com> <20080102021907.GA15494@thyrsus.com> <200801020445.m024jWU2008538@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801031805.m03I5SBf022748@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801050901.m0591mQj011970@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20080105143415.GG30869@thyrsus.com> <200801061037.m06AbIRD004966@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801182346.m0INkiEg022130@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200703577 28556 80.91.229.12 (19 Jan 2008 00:46:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, harsanyi@mac.com, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 19 01:46:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JG1r0-0008Vx-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:46:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JG1qb-0000Fp-74 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:46:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JG1qW-0000Fk-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:46:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JG1qU-0000FG-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JG1qU-0000F5-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JG1qQ-0004C4-6u; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:45:58 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0J0jqf4013971; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:45:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0J0jpuQ010302; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:45:51 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0J0jpsO029124; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:45:51 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5B7673780F4; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:10:42 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <200801182346.m0INkiEg022130@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Fri\, 18 Jan 2008 15\:46\:39 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87071 Archived-At: >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Nicolaescu writes: Dan> Sorry, I was convinced that this was checked in, but it was Dan> not. It is now. Thanks. I've been meaning to ping the list about all the patches I have sent but that have not been committed or reviewed. In GCC-land we tell people to ping after a week... what is the accepted time for Emacs? Dan> But it needs to be updated to work with the asynchronous Dan> interface. Can you please do that? I will try to get to it soon. BTW I noticed that the new dir-status back end hook is not documented. Tom