From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing the gnutls support Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:29:59 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87r5g0x0fd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83mxqnmqqy.fsf@gnu.org> <8762xalkgg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipv3krh1.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301430940 17796 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2011 20:35:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:35:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 22:35:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4fdU-0001uP-TS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:35:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36395 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4fdT-0007ct-SM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55254 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4fdC-0007cA-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4fd8-0003om-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4fd7-0003oP-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4fd3-0001k4-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:35:05 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:35:05 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:35:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEWcd2lbNzPXyr3+//3/ ///+//6/rpjz8OyVoZcSAAACbklEQVQ4jVWTTZObMAyGZbo1V4sDew2EwnVnS5frjlHia2e7014N myHXhNDw9ysbQ1td/PHYeiVZBlqsvU3LRF9q0v1MEEAze2CqcigaMwxfAmir3340eT6MvS6hD2Ce a8/vfV9QU9O93IAfXnb9ngw+EuUOHOZbkze1jt/HS090RMWbDuhymKtxziAqy4LoFXFawAuoc1XK Ugj5wcufCosAhOora5Ou8hHosgvgyKC3NpJTCLkLrmiHfS5EH090GPd0zMQKtJC5SEVSt/eh+oWd YHVYCtEpG9mkL1H2VwceFtB+BVRlGUmp7JA5cApFNJFVl2iQKcizu5GugPh4BlICyGJEIZINHIdK yJ11YEb8B2jVi/OlBDtMDDB5WIGBSJxhRFnR+B+YrVSgZpFOHqQraCtEkPm5jMkBUJ/XcG+IKm7j viK68xEIN37MmkN5oHy4ET0L1isWkE9XdnyiJmegu9TiUsS2OggPWtcSxwzd2zpgCvaE7tmcXSxg qO6b97QCKwUIzrwd8rEVqHwH+FQtKheVlohW4QdivRQHeAUxQSadm0T7ZmJ7UpBmkBCIfe78a0yD NiAIXkBE+wvG3H6PQVso5Lq5qJ5pfqcnTsMb4ICfhKgZvNUse92CUnc4dTgxaF0CnVofJm2huGDh EtzT0vrODiKh5/pVnBzgv6FXCb56cD/BA/3Os/A3WezbBsxE30MWtBwJgEWujyswrpjHRZwaylYJ In49llyAaYZpA92HA9PS1HlOi0tXLAZGhS7ZxX7whb+zVyMDuEebJwOsYYYA9F+gZe1oGxpObuB4 dqLgxA9OZIvK+Jkt/gCQ0gE8txIZZwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Chicks On Speed's _Cutting the Edge (1)_: "Art Rules" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bjH2wtwSzmZuu9HqUyFRFYai9M4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137869 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > It's probably cleaner to save every invalid certificate in a list and > give the user a UI to choose which certificates they wish to accept, > perhaps linking to the last validation failure and whatever else will > help the user identify which certificates he wants to accept (maybe a > hash ID of the certificate in the messages buffer). What's the use case here? If I'm connecting to imap.gmail.com, I probably do want to be prompted with a "invalid certificate" if the certificate is invalid. And possibly a "view certificate" before accepting it anyway. Is anything more complicated than that necessary? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen