From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:18:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334092747 17349 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2012 21:19:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 10 23:19:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiSv-00015g-TZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:19:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiSv-00066K-5v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiSr-000663-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiSp-0001sW-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiSp-0001sS-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiTq-0007T0-Ev; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.133409278828677 (code B ref 9243); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2012 21:19:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiTc-0007SU-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:33823) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiTa-0007SM-86 for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:19:47 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHiSS-0000h0-QF; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:18:36 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Various's _Minimal Wave Tapes Volume 2_: "Subject - What Happened To You?" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:56:53 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1SHiSS-0000h0-QF MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1334697516.88854@cEdVUiwwzOOkfRtu1EyBcQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58727 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > After (setq nnimap-expunge nil), the expiry that happens when I leave > a group still takes a good while (I didn't notice any serious > difference), but moving email from one IMAP folder to another with "B m" > is *much* faster. If this is with a big group, then this has been fixed in Ma Gnus, but the fix is not applicable for Emacs 24.1. It involves tracking what messages actually exist on the IMAP server, and not just the low/high water marks, and is kinda hairy. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/