From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22789: 25.1.50; In last master build https connections stop working Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <864mcyo14y.fsf@Lenovo-PC.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <868u25p3m2.fsf@realize.ch> <83io18ahya.fsf@gnu.org> <86y4a3on6f.fsf@realize.ch> <87oaazg7fv.fsf@gnus.org> <86twkro0vr.fsf@realize.ch> <87mvqjgqqg.fsf@gnus.org> <86k2lnnlwy.fsf@realize.ch> <831t7u9826.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb56vkti.fsf@gnus.org> <83ziui6w1s.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1rcrc36.fsf@gnus.org> <83twko64y7.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh60nnh4.fsf@gnus.org> <83egbqzkvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8me32ah.fsf@gnus.org> <831t7qz4c3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1r9xdko.fsf@gnu.org> <83egbnwrtq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457289328 22511 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2016 18:35:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: j_l_domenech@yahoo.com, a.s@realize.ch, 22789@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 06 19:35:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1acdWO-0007Jl-Ss for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:35:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51664 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acdWL-0004mO-16 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acdWE-0004cL-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acdWA-0001Ug-PX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acdWA-0001UP-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acdWA-0006Hq-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 18:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22789.145728925324089 (code B ref 22789); Sun, 06 Mar 2016 18:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2016 18:34:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acdVN-0006GS-2n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acdVH-0006GG-J7 for 22789@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:34:11 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1acdUt-0006nM-Ef; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:33:43 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAADFBMVEXmbwryjxH7vhy6PQdD 1ZnqAAACOUlEQVQokR3SP2gTURwH8N/z/khKy6U0F0wWcVHpFEGdCpc0aUCx5GLuRXMIaquR3FQd pdDTasFFRXLBBIdackneWwRnIVdjlhDJYpdsgi6drhXrcvH56m/7wPfLd/lBUsUWpS3qYLMNqSLG xzCMeBtQKcNBKX491QSEk1FK72OcnOpwQLZBUpW9hUEHJIyiptsoJdiAgHQPFedrlKyxMQHVALVc p+7GaJ+jCoZ1nTobzOTQwym6SBwteP8fF0h2Z3sUuCVQM3qffHyaZn9nfwKeXZffdHWfHTy8Ahgd yO4rxtif3WWIgBcqFXJc3zkS3q7ZHnHcWQbB6/2Yd4OI9vnuDKSF4aLpTiIs5qzDtODLxc6lQtB6 sQEJpRezOpc3D52bGvhsRjWNR92Q+Y6B4HuqIdl+jG4zUEYZ9ZZcU1dolQHzAF/sU6tGDQ4RjC99 Um7QGwEEYbQqqm4lTh74EOiokDifr1x1b/vgX/tdEKjqUueTBz6g3Dmr+LLx3BeBCVLubJ3MW/o3 EYYJKXeU3SZ02sjDgictaePHreaJaoqPhpB+ar/VjmEdRl5ErZymrl7CSWA+MioTDtwUeGzPaR/R FRuTHngQdT4Mdrbs4lsAb0Z2uuaWbOebHCA7LKZGbZxXONDm5Ay27CWJcUA3g7LWE1HsAb9De21A 7VkQwAsrkjE3ps/Ek8edAPR0nFZFgUOYLObBotiY0yCsfEVCOM7fJf0LwtpQYtNxUq4qIwAFpYda tG7pivIPCUH8fpOoqUYAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <83egbnwrtq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Mar 2016 17:26:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1acdUt-0006nM-Ef MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1457894023.6189@dClSnJY2BrytPhDYRRgwCw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114508 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: a.s@realize.ch, j_l_domenech@yahoo.com, 22789@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 10:33:08 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> /* If status of something has changed, and no input is >> >> available, notify the user of the change right away. After >> >> this explicit check, we'll let the SIGCHLD handler zap >> >> timeout to get our attention. */ >> >> [...] >> >> > The comment above seems to explain what it does, no? >> >> I don't understand it, or how it relates to calling pselect with a zero >> timeout. :-) > > It wants to poll, so it sets the time-out at zero, meaning "don't wait > at all". Or am _I_ missing something? But why does it want to poll? I'm wondering whether any of the async-related timeout changes are... provoking the "if (update_tick != process_tick)" bit to always be true in some cases, and making this polling behaviour happen infinitely... or something... But I've been completely unable to reproduce the error, so I'm just speculating. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no