From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only? Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:28:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <24db2975-17ca-ad01-20c8-df12071fa89a@dancol.org> <4615E73A-19E2-4B79-9889-D3FA686DDDE6@raeburn.org> <83bmy0pl8p.fsf@gnu.org> <831sywp7ew.fsf@gnu.org> <83y413nsjm.fsf@gnu.org> <403a4fd8-f9da-82df-956b-a3187de83cf9@cs.ucla.edu> <83lgx3no0k.fsf@gnu.org> <633d43c4-946e-e318-d8de-be1c2fde26f7@dancol.org> <83eg2vnn4s.fsf@gnu.org> <20161101151549.1cd887d6@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478028786 26072 195.159.176.226 (1 Nov 2016 19:33:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 19:33:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 20:33:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1enc-0003zS-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:32:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50770 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ene-0002WU-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55053) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1emM-0002VL-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:31:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1emI-00061a-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1emI-0005zh-6o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1em3-0008Vu-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:31:14 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWYjovRzcwPBgcMBAQL AgMJAAFdU1IxKCj////+//4bEhL4+PeB5JKfAAACYElEQVQ4jZ3TT2/TMBQAcHegtFovLUijaJfJ 7hYpN+zsA6xJhLQTgkZIO4WBbOguWYdsKb20lylRLpygxy6daim7DCGhsn05nCZlYQsX3iWyf3m2 n/+A8B8B/gMm7Xa71amAWEG7E157zcqhJpRuLSsg1hhvNR7CRKOcgub0PkR1LpgHAGj/+hvGC0YZ BVm0t6cleCI549xbiVa7vYMNgwuqMjQNAMZB7fkazgzVz9XvAx4gAnXeyeELMiQVFGzfqqmICjzK YYNAmXKvNo187WQTIcibK4jOiC4kp80w9rXTuAW2i8kjREQgZAYzwJZ3dcQIJSIxjEYY+bW63ykB hEMLm1dh6LW0ZNEsZWATm/0XCkB9CIW3ruNyV7eI0z8IJ+9AfQDTRBZ1fHawY0G0B9gOpTpOIbzI 4b1pu31opLLb475xZkC4l8MHBe4bwxBzm7P5AEOo5/DYdFXgNFXlDBK1I6sMtf1PHdXv9NI0lYFu EALhLM/4sZ9luHqQSiiHSG3WVQ7fdlX34aV7KAIpGB1C+DGHczW362uL7pEQUh0UM4o6xqbjvgXa py2nJ0QqeI0VECO3/wponbFpKxkKwZfF0R677ktKp2PbIkSoiWZ/bsnua079cGLaFjSlCE7XcI6O Fuw0jOe2hQnWh6M1xMdET9TaH9kEEbRabXF3r700a90QgjAiRqP0DAZZa0xQBnqnBM921BLjRI1D 8N60BN9Xd2ADIgU7pYdTxFcIESGzhxCzdE7IxUMIfwZdt18FEwXWqALCzX0XN6rgxrT0ZRWMu72T 7Bvdh5j5y0pYR/QbXAbhsXppCpMAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <20161101151549.1cd887d6@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> (Perry E. Metzger's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:15:49 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209087 Archived-At: I've tried to google for various combinations of malloc/thread/unsafe/bug, and the only thing I've found is this: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6952 In 2008, there was a malloc bug in glibc that, in some situations, made using malloc from the non-main thread problematic. (And typically enough, Ulrich Drepper responds "Worthless report.", and more emails happen, and then some time passes, and then he fixes the bug without responding to the report. Ah, glibc. :-)) I may be using the wrong search terms, but that's the only thing I found of interest... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no