From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 7555f93: Remove src/macuvs.h from Git repository Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190621220118.16051.70712@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190621220121.8B68D209DE@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <10o92qqxla.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="211869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 22 10:56:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hebpL-000ssq-Qw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:56:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hebpC-00029I-N3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hebp6-00026L-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hebp5-0005tC-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:56:36 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hebp5-0005rz-4m; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1heboz-0003zo-D4; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:56:31 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEX531z673r8/+H4ryP7 +8r4w0bdPAH////+/+rzjA9H2euVAAACLUlEQVQ4jV2Uz4vdIBDHDd0U3k1pstDrI7DvuCBZ8GgQ ur35CC70HCp4LYXkHArJsYs04H/bGfNjfW8IQvz4/Y4zmhBeG6NzQwjROBDNcMwo4ZwbTY745Pa3 A7CMMkZOlvsVgFO0yFiMkxUb8DifkRxBIRn1eb0DGCj9/F4opSSKtmy+1jkkOL0rBBxFG+A6r8EH BefKoGolXvwlNc6fL/M8omwz8y8dOCnVVJe+n4axUqzUdAU6K1Qzj1MPMcyKvXSocdwHEFz6LeZK WkuoAdDarGj6I0YArAzE1aZlH4K+P6u3nwi8gRTNnIBKwu5bLJAxNX2A+XdsAOm4ZmkKTMKAQHKd KZWCgbLyGUGdqXJKgWSPjoIVgDRH31fyawT/snS3oDgr+kyx8nsA7YKWWGGzW6ehkthEG+zDPWDE YK/CVT3dAEVzw4mDIyzuADMReF28puSXLE3LifXcFJfpBoATgMDNQ9qroaI551EBpT+loASBwBwA viVOqmy5gBMMzlybVCHzVoQIeCheE8X3jgcA1gUASfbq0YkIAmxLq3k6UnzxYVPUBkrcwPBH5iFs Ct+a42aNMhfB7cCYa6HGOK+kEcHuALzgujfjBe5U+SMsOwj4RTMVg3KYt3aJyZcO9nVdP8E2RGCh QGcXOBO4qIzQLN+BJQ4dPccfBDzYDLsCL6BQAF6ENZYNwPURAgCPYHEfAJYLB4BvwB5g6ZawzcNy tyssrFo8yCKwR/wHLD97DdITXmkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:25:43 -0700") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238026 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > On 6/21/19 5:21 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: >> Was having src/macuvs.h in the repository causing a problem? >> It has changed twice since 2014. > > Not a major problem, no. I made the change because Lars ran into > something; perhaps he can chime in. I was just puzzled -- it wasn't really a problem. Putting the file back in (and adding a comment to the file why it's both in CVS and autogenerated) would be fine by me. If there's a practical part to this, it's that running "make" could (in principle (if somebody changed something in that iso text file)) alter a checked-in file, and that's... unusual? And perhaps confusing? But perhaps the "clean" targets shouldn't remove the file? That's perhaps the most unusual thing of all here -- a tracked file that's removed by a target... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no