From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). Date: 10 Apr 2004 20:31:08 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <8765cwkejr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <200404071157.UAA25094@etlken.m17n.org> <200404071312.WAA25268@etlken.m17n.org> <87zn9nqras.fsf@emacswiki.org> <200404080203.LAA26847@etlken.m17n.org> <87u0zufp7t.fsf-monnier+emacs@alfajor.local> <20040410000843.GC7497@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081617269 20167 80.91.224.253 (10 Apr 2004 17:14:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 19:14:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCM3g-0002ba-00 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:14:20 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCM3g-000826-00 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:14:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCLpy-0000Jg-Nj for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BCLnz-0008BW-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BCLYU-0003fb-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCLOG-0007SG-Ml; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 9875F47FE51; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:31:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <20040410000843.GC7497@fencepost> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21443 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21443 Miles Bader writes: > I wrote: > > I'd like to (post-release) merge my tiling branch too; I don't seen any > > particularly good reason to keep it separate. I think the only probable > > conflict is with multi-tty (at the least because of RIF changes). > > I did a test merge of multi-tty with tiling, and there are actually very few > patch conflicts, though the RIF changes probably do mean there are few > semantic errors in the result. > > I'd love see the multi-tty changes go in -- not just because it's a great > feature (and it is), but because I like the code cleanup. Compared to the > current "everything global all the time" code, it should make things a bit > easier to understand, which is no small thing given the confusingness of the > redisplay code. Yes, I also look forward to the RIF cleanup from the multi-tty patch. I had plans to do this cleanup myself sometime, but Romain beat me to it. It should definitely go in soon after 21.5 is branched from trunk. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk