From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch to make VC annotate async Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:53:35 -0600 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182795190 23090 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2007 18:13:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Hackers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 25 20:13:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I2t3j-0003Z8-3n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:13:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2t3i-00047d-EM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2t3f-00047X-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2t3d-00046h-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2t3c-00046H-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I2t3c-000769-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5PICxmw025983; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5PICxSL001928; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:12:59 -0400 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5PICwO5009451; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:12:58 -0400 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D0DE5888032; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:53:35 -0600 (MDT) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon\, 25 Jun 2007 12\:54\:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73841 Archived-At: >>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier writes: Stefan> Oh, I see. So we're in full agreement. Awesome. >> This suggests that you preferred the approach I took ;-) >> But, I don't really care. I can rewrite it to use vc-exec-after -- >> if that is what you want, let me know, and I will send a new patch. Stefan> Yes, that's what I wrote as well, isn't it? Sorry about that, I misread what you wrote. Tom