From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:47:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83bp5te3s8.fsf@gnu.org> <83eiajdee6.fsf@gnu.org> <8339qycsa4.fsf@gnu.org> <83sjyxblcq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290167292 9232 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2010 11:48:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 12:48:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJPRm-0004EI-Rx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:48:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49917 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJPRm-0001x7-AE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35791 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJPRg-0001vq-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJPRf-0000RM-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:48:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:36512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJPRe-0000Qf-DY; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444731C08CE5; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:47:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from hase (ppp-88-217-122-42.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.122.42]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63121C004FA; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:47:55 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I'll show you MY telex number if you show me YOURS... In-Reply-To: <83sjyxblcq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:31:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132852 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org >> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:53:57 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > But what about code points above MAX_UNICODE_CHAR? Currently we >> > display them as [E+NNNNNN]. Use \eNNNNNN? >> >> \U00NNNNNN > > That'd be a lie, wouldn't it? These are not Unicode code points. Does it matter? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."