From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A cleaning-up patch for parse-time.el Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:35:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a8lveya2.fsf@mbork.pl> <874mbur097.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458923737 27009 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2016 16:35:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Developers To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 17:35:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajUhq-0006Yq-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:35:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajUhp-0001Gt-MQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajUhc-0001Gd-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:35:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajUhY-0008Vf-EF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajUhY-0008UB-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajUhU-0005Hh-3e; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:35:06 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWig3I7KSRjTEPSuaYm GRYHBAQWDQzEv7SOAAACd0lEQVQ4jUWUQY7bMAxFGekCpaBmLXGMrj3WCRRotC8Qe59C4f2P0E/Z 7QheGHkmRfJ/hrRX5sgseISoXGcjVYDG4b7vB56UJRGt5EgbZwZ7X2ARO/dIOh6Sa437BE9Bwpxz vyOi5hzDrwnevyVaQG4ddzwMfO1G+ourQ9DSGu37AwXltwFtf3IgqReoqDYaQOUhJ78muk3QW6v9 bd/3FvKHd0Ju9BM0AG0DvQLcWLIa+HoOVYAxWuScyifLLSrpcT8OVd1HH7GKk/JZ0SDAQKUA7wMg pOLK9hD52ekYX0jzthCMMZXNuzDB/uxf+zFaxzQlUFnTBEqo/gQjIgBjR7lnxH6ghxHbaCaIB3CS 7wZsSI3RDOeAXN/AlBgcFTIyJ/KEMfZOTQ2gZRM32PWEF0TwwDiOaipEySa7d5ljJ6iqJ8gokwzc JtAWhw7GDwBUHIxyyyHe0UfTPh6wBkJoXQHwwnc6tGtrJ5i+QhTKXjDEhu4ehCMXQNLHBDiVzuNL QTbm10JtgpDgvsugABkRrUYEBPLfwGUD5mgAX+gCft1EQgRgjPwE/nI6gEVgfsNGlNYTQMI8QUSH uBxg3oBcssiCWcX+hEaYnQWsAJvLE+AKLEjyji6wQtyFXsiEYbVEW5pgnRoCNDPVaMG8hq8JN2UD A76B48bczeKhbFnFUplroS0UJ1tL69IAdnA3R0OVH2TyJQPB5Ujmf8AXow0kOwGWj6ajdVQzoYhL 9FFWrO1iTlQ9WrW1h4Yp+TleA7se8BXyrw7uFW+C8HJZ9GUeJEzPwBY4/APPaiJKMGsVc9IFYF5s RzLgyCn/T2V/F4ORAXXR7YhI9RfkudJjq0JK5wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: <874mbur097.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:27:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202230 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski writes: > I have to admit that my goal was also to "test"the community: are such > patches welcome? Now I understand that (1) correcting docstrings is > probably seen as useful and (2) general cleaning of the code sometimes > is and sometimes not, depending on how nitpicky it is. Cleanliness is in the eyes of the observer. :-) > I hope to provide more such patches in the future. I'm aware that it's > not the thing Emacs wants or needs the most, but if I'm reading some > code anyway, why not correct it? Please do, but submit the patches with `M-x report-emacs-bug' so that they don't get lost. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no