From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The netsec thread Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:33:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83bmb214ez.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532089898 31832 195.159.176.226 (20 Jul 2018 12:31:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:31:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: wyuenho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 20 14:31:34 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUZI-00088t-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:31:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47960 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUbP-00067c-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUbE-00065Z-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:33:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUb9-0003cQ-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUb9-0003bx-7U; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUb4-0007Uc-HW; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:33:24 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEUNBQQRCAcaDAs5FxV+ TUSohQhOAAACRklEQVQ4jVVUgZHbMAyjnAUk5geIyAzwFjVAa2n/mQrQzV/r+/g+hAiQIBUp1s3C rOFRvlotVVqTZr0BGR2hrsRra6WZVMVXj9GqlDuhaW+aQDP3LiJFeFZBq01FtHePMJGE6mHWtdcm EAFTxDeiBQk4k0XgmMaYey0zFFNshuE8qeSI84mU4eNlzcNQYGqATKniY3RTH6lxAx49JlIsWzLv JCXVXMP3nuEolB0ijkpEHmuFQx5sxsOItgTescMSAFsvdjcBeM9lIwgMNm2suxQyzStibiaMG+jZ IJlmLDIhBSVbdigyAVzyxXgY/tgHOkyJ+bs8ghr+/RwW/Wi9yWPPPX+VB0VsSLmcAKigveclAGac ZyskPPoNrAlxlLtPZIDR9EUg5mJNSIjT2xOlj/aqBDbYMRG+FbZwUpXAQogm7ulxqlGjlVoJgAs1 TceuFIPF/VAAz02uCSUsy2iaQJWafYDe9yhYEM4JnVd4+EwA4qOUBCxeyml8QZY97PUiMBLDJskb 7SWwsarmH6AKSqI6gYw60+jVXIxmVarJhA+nfksgbd3K2C//CyDmOT3TXGNOEACcxTNjxN0FhnKP FiWRbYNt2EUEALZeYHkieIPcT00TkYFy9ufBfxcvSK6P738ezLH4DwAS2LVRJmSukvsGFx2e52kf qM2vvLm4IMIRbWzKgmkR7865ytFV0ifm0OAZ/f4RgCt39PNcI2/m/wD5AhcN8f4DoMtJDU6cCZrA SoMnbwIuZssrYnLT0MiF/Tk7NNLNP91brLIkzdkrAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: <83bmb214ez.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:24:04 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227575 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Would it make sense to have a button "More details" there, which would > then display these details? That would be nice, but when the buffer is displayed, Emacs is waiting for multiple choice prompt, so the user can't really click anything. Hm... perhaps that could be fixed by avoiding the multiple choice prompt, and making that buffer into its own major mode with keys bound to what are now choice items? That is, instead of saying "Continue connecting? ([a]lways, [n]o)" etc via that mechanism, it would just `message' that line and bind the `a' (etc) key to the appropriate action? It would require quite a bit of rewriting to go from "modal" interaction to "mode based" interaction, though. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no