Re: Fix for slow process output processing (please test).

[storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)]

Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org> writes:

> I have tried running the code, but I'm not sure I understand this well
> enough to interpret the results. With adaptive buffering on, we get
> more 1024 byte blocks, but we get nothing for Time: 0 (which may be a
> symptom of the noticeable delay that was reported?), and we also have
> a Time: 9, which I think might mean it is taking longer overall. The
> numbers are all in at least the high hundreds for both tests, so maybe
> Windows is doing some buffering behind the scenes anyway.

I just made a small adjustment to the adaptive read buffering
algorithm, which I think will make it behave better on Windoze
(without making it behave worse with Linux kernels).

Please test the new version, and see if it behaves better than before.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk