From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BZR error! Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:49:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4B41BC84.7060305@alice.it> <87k4vy59y5.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87fx6m576n.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <83skald8ql.fsf@gnu.org> <83my0tci5s.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqbhgjpt.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262706638 9505 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2010 15:50:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 16:50:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from terminus-est.gnu.org ([66.92.78.210] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSBfy-0000d8-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:50:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55476 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSBfy-0002Mz-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSBf4-0001il-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:49:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSBf0-0001fI-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:49:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41044 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSBez-0001fB-Sq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:49:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52834) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSBex-0005WD-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o05FnPn1010157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:49:26 -0500 Original-Received: from hase.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o05FnNGj010829; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:49:24 -0500 X-Yow: Did you GAIN WEIGHT in th' past 5 MINUTES or am I just DREAMING of two BROCCOLI FLORETS lying in an empty GAS TANK? In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:10:17 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.18 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119443 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I'm sure they're not interested: if you use the bzr+ssh access method > rather than sftp, it downloads less than a megabyte. The bzr+ssh method would have downloaded about the same amount. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."