From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9017: 24.0.50; gnutls.c: [0] (Emacs) fatal error: Key usage violation in certificate has been detected. Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ei22yzz3.fsf@niu.edu> <19990.21514.711483.515100@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19995.450.645561.299970@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19995.2276.68599.608421@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19995.3751.825437.128524@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19995.6586.299315.729607@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19997.45936.636066.132554@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19997.49819.733446.452844@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87hb6n7ars.fsf@lifelogs.com> <20002.11953.120421.334092@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310863526 19121 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2011 00:45:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9017@debbugs.gnu.org, Ted Zlatanov To: "Roland Winkler" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 17 02:45:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFU1-0000M2-4P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:45:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFU0-00065a-BT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFTl-00063r-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFTj-0005hs-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFTj-0005hk-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFTi-0000S8-UR; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9017.13108634721689 (code B ref 9017); Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2011 00:44:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFTD-0000RC-RR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:44:32 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFTB-0000Qz-RG for 9017@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:44:30 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=quimbies.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QiFT0-0007Tv-2t; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:44:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20002.11953.120421.334092@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Roland Winkler's message of "Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:37:05 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEUEKDsWQVgrYn0BHy8N M0cAEB8fUWtKjK/jzkKIAAACYklEQVQ4jV2UQXPbIBCF1xHTXo3CqNeEOvJVsaI7JDg9N6p+AEoG X2vVY/39vl3kJC0zsjz78d7CsojaVSzrmFKK/qnthmFYHuorP8bKWrsOyvun+6IrXn/uAe5NFavt ZKfft+fNVbk5n+3V5va0J79KuoTgfLr5M+1evtvJvtw92j25Z05g7TRPV/YbJmBSeSz3pGCV0mht fGoxdtd2d/3ldRwo+KgzcAwe7U3Sh8e7gbzxYsWgA/h63h0Pp/NAJngR1DEUUPw4TuOxjFNHIWgR pAx44N3BSmsI4KaNJGkaBi2DCgLEFwCUAeLViAxaa1dcnASkJFYggRqEiFHHYEzvSTC5ISLOTsiQ VwVNIIkLAUiJq27zuhg4BUIpSRIGKZpCFM5RwcnrC0iGGKgQ8Ot5GwzsWKfoOE5B4RUqidqcxrBT YC8K+jOI65aUc4GB59KmBdWQhCA5UHUB8yQkOqWCIOVlFxnMtl7TBxCfGc8WNP4PBM6zvc1JjIDx A0z1Wl1A7oUavzNL3lihvSh4RF2Ns0hcCN7oDHB82mgBLFEB4MFrzDbsW24XiQoa5QxV4jiK8Cxg njYPwWtqvJbjRsFX2Wuu4aWpRY5oAhVNocoMpjcV/AIcTrtonudFssbOW4VVAXA3rXKS2W4E6HfQ LF62BuhxuNHklmmXdVnrAJqAzXF3tF33wLdx3lqLZQ6N8gwaSLp+xaWuD0k7ABwid1rgjsUslKGM Zk1D32A/jpsWoG85mecuwf+ljwv5YvTyxegHBnwnim5oBVwGDUO+R2zzKd4tCr5Dw2cBW/VZ8O/4 9ReouP8YBcLfZgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Tuxedomoon's _Desire_ X-Hashcash: 1:23:110717:tzz@lifelogs.com::Na6k4zr6xhmRRf7L:01db/ X-Hashcash: 1:23:110717:winkler@gnu.org::LDK0npCTrbjbG3CP:00+PO4 X-Hashcash: 1:23:110717:9017@debbugs.gnu.org::Q2MkkzfS6SiHf5le:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000q4FB X-MailScanner-ID: 1QiFT0-0007Tv-2t MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1311468258.16828@JYL1L1ZV5nnBoUSjlxY2RQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:45:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49302 Archived-At: "Roland Winkler" writes: > Similar to disabling gnutls-available-p, this now aborts with the > message > > RCPT TO: > 554 : Recipient address rejected: Access denied Is this with all the workarounds (including the `smtpmail-stream-type') disabled? What's the SMTP server type? If you don't have any customisations enabled, I may have fixed this particular problem i bzr Emacs now. > I understand your goal and in the long run it is probably the best > solution. I am merely looking at this from the perspective: if I had > been a regular user running into such a problem after release of > emacs 24, I would have been stuck. Emacs 24 is half a year away, at least. > So even if the command line gnutls-cli is not perfect by itself, it > would give the user a more forgiving transition period if with Emacs > 24 the old approach remained available as a fallback. Sure. But there's no reason why the built-in GnuTLS support shouldn't be even more flexible than the gnutls-cli support. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/