From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#536: Emacs makes inferior-scheme and inferior-lisp hang when... Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:12:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315762445 18841 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 17:34:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 536@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 19:34:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nup-0007WG-Bm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:33:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nuo-00081m-Rj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nul-0007u2-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nuj-0001eg-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nuj-0001eR-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nyr-0003iQ-0S; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:38:09 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:38:08 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 536 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 536-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B536.131576268614246 (code B ref 536); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:38:08 +0000 Original-Received: (at 536) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 17:38:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nyn-0003he-GK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nyd-0003g1-3b for 536@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nuN-0003ci-RL; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:33:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Kjetil S. Matheussen's message of "Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:16:02 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Various's _Not Alone (3)_: "The Bricoleur - Prah Pip Ta" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2nuN-0003ci-RL MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316367211.90917@8KUc9J97063nY8xBQEDVoA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:38:09 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50927 Archived-At: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" writes: > So, I have uploaded a new emacsbug.scm file, which > is really big. But, it seems to be about 100% sure > to hit the bug if doing the following: > > 1. Load this file into emacs: > http://www.notam02.no/~kjetism/emacsbug.scm Is this still a problem in current Emacs? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/