From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] xwidget updated (1d8b8a2 -> 5f46725) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20141226164113.11620.38682@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <831tnjlpts.fsf@gnu.org> <83k31ajvdz.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq4v4rr9.fsf@gnu.org> <838uh21ly4.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq4lzp3j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3utz3l4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421518433 3184 80.91.229.3 (17 Jan 2015 18:13:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 17 19:13:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YCXsa-00034i-Mu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCXsZ-0001OT-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:13:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCXsM-0001Nt-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:13:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCXsM-0006Ks-0h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:13:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.bahnhof.se ([213.80.101.11]:40591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCXsI-0006KI-63; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:13:30 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (mf.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.20]) by mx1-reinject (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C22040D30; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at bahnhof.se (MF3) Original-Received: from mf3.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mf3.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id svGlatQc7mg2; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mta.verona.se (h-235-62.a149.priv.bahnhof.se [85.24.235.62]) by mf3.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84BE3E8C61; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC3B529C8E; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:13:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at verona.se Original-Received: from mta.verona.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (exodia.verona.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69efyjSGO4Fn; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from exodia.verona.se (www.verona.se [192.168.200.15]) by mta.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17986529C8D; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:13:03 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83r3utz3l4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:04:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 213.80.101.11 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181378 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: joakim@verona.se >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:40:48 +0100 >> >> Now I tried the same test, but with an image. It behaves the same way! > > Hmm... yes, I see that, too. > >> So this would seem to indicate a number of possibilities: >> >> - My test is somewhow flawed. Perhaps (set (make-local-variable >> 'bidi-paragraph-direction) 'right-to-left) isnt supposed to affect >> images and xwidgets etc. >> >> - my xwidget code is so flawed that it affects the image code where it >> shouldnt. (the code paths are supposed to be separate though) >> >> - this is how its supposed to work, and everything is allright. > > No, it's a bug, and I will fix it. > > Thanks. Ah, I'm glad we discovered something :) -- Joakim Verona