From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18643: 25.0.50; elisp--expect-function-p Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:36:25 +0800 Message-ID: References: <3601111412974400@web5o.yandex.ru> <5439585A.3030201@yandex.ru> <543F2ED7.5020603@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413430649 11719 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2014 03:37:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "18643@debbugs.gnu.org" <18643@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 16 05:37:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XebsP-0005K6-LT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 05:37:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XebsP-00007t-1O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XebsE-00007o-DI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xebs6-0000IA-SR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xebs6-0000Hn-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xebs5-0005P1-V4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18643 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18643-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18643.141343059620727 (code B ref 18643); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2014 03:36:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xebrg-0005OF-4A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:46264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xebrd-0005O5-6e for 18643@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id lj1so2591079pab.10 for <18643@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:36:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=qA46PnKqq9OALn10WXzx95dApyqcBsQV5PIefEXtXgw=; b=CDPuNrqYBG/ncHlcvU7X2KCCOWyED42+ivNNMIcdIOygmpq7xCX68kivky8PJxxN2V R2Y7dndpTMMmtjOC6xxPdvwu+lTIzHwRJ5ywFlzQdVvu0HcInqME4YfjHX66E6ijlFai M8hRSOz0fXV2KLSBIE03XpIk8wtEHiiprT7aGLunOWGgB5o4i4E/KC9Pc2jpOJNpJ5KO E0djUeL38Gc3DK9eVc9gWdG/AG4WfKRovFeuvQhAlNfCux3lfJTK5OgkNFAEtMDqjlI6 tFGZuMXCg0LewRp3tdiRK9nJCdGV8BN0j30QGQvSHIF1vLbTByFPsmb+wdHSud0+N66F 6+gg== X-Received: by 10.66.249.66 with SMTP id ys2mr931796pac.143.1413430591926; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from fortuna ([221.222.153.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ib8sm12206714pad.43.2014.10.15.20.36.29 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <543F2ED7.5020603@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:35:03 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (CentOS 6.5) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94574 On 2014-10-16 06:35 +0400, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > Still, the text written in a way I described may be not Lisp code, but > it's unlikely to be prose (unless it's a way of displaying a block > quote?), so this kind of heuristic can be useful anyway. In the past 1-2 months I happen to write an elisp tool from scratch, which has the following stats: component 1: file1: 2744 lines file2: 275 lines component 2: file1: 3194 lines with component 2 v0.7.2 released on 08 Oct 2014. The packages are developed using emacs trunk and happened to have some parts developed before the change and others after the change. When I told you I tried to live with it, I did try very hard. Speaking from experience, the recent change to elisp-completion-at-point has gotten in the way more than just once. It is painfully difficult to see how this is an improvement to the default features. (BTW, I hope to submit the packages for inclusion in emacs sometime later) Leo