From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new compile command doesn't coalesce errors on the same line Date: 29 Mar 2004 00:59:08 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040317215208.5b0cb3e2.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040317224726.GC12561@fencepost> <20040320074137.2ea2c886.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040321092224.039cd09b.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040323202359.1f75a72f.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040328233217.71d75077.occitan@esperanto.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080511526 25160 80.91.224.253 (28 Mar 2004 22:05:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 29 00:05:16 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7iP6-0007QM-00 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:05:16 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7iP6-00021R-00 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:05:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7iK6-0006YY-1Y for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:00:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B7iK0-0006W2-Fz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B7iJT-0006LL-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:59:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7iJT-0006Kk-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:59:27 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CF4C26284A; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:59:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Daniel Pfeiffer In-Reply-To: <20040328233217.71d75077.occitan@esperanto.org> Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21036 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21036 dapfy@t-online.de (Daniel Pfeiffer) writes: > How about intervening lines, as a compiler at work gives me? Are these still > contiguous: > > a.c:9: bla bla > bla bla happened here: > y = f( x ); > ^ > a.c:9: foo bar ... IMHO, to keep things simple, I would say no. > > I guess we'd need to limit the height of a contiguous block to the (most > recently) visible lines, and ignore anything else there is within that area. All of this sounds overly complicated. Can't it simply be done by saying that if two or more consecutive lines points to the same source line, it shall ignore all but the first one. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk