From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:06:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17491.34779.959316.484740@parhasard.net> <87odyfnqcj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17498.27200.911709.330947@parhasard.net> <877j4z5had.fsf@gmx.de> <87irohfrx1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147680552 22902 80.91.229.2 (15 May 2006 08:09:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alkibiades@gmx.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 15 10:09:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfY8X-0001Gl-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:09:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfY8W-0007tR-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 04:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfY83-0007tM-Me for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 04:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfY81-0007tA-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 04:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfY81-0007t7-Kr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 04:08:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FfYAN-0006oW-PN; Mon, 15 May 2006 04:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C1058A00CB; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 15 May 2006 14:13:20 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54493 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa writes: > But, as emacs-mule is not affected by > unify-8859-on-decoding, we don't have to invent it as long > as we suggest people to use emacs-mule in a problematic > case. So why not _always_ use emacs-mule for .elc files (both on write and on load)? Could it be a problem with existing *.elc files? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk