From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bidi branch Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:16:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <833a073kss.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrxj1o92.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdd220yk.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5nq1vox.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq920w4t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268505230 8806 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2010 18:33:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 19:33:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqW9a-0001tJ-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:33:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqW9a-0000gm-6r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqW9T-0000f0-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:33:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59752 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqW9S-0000cx-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:33:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqW9R-0000QN-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:33:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]:52619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqW9N-0000Pe-Pb; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:33:25 -0500 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 6702D40086; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:33:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1268505204; bh=s1+mtL5qGAHpyXZiy0Ugp7mXUscqs4w2sYLb7KHJvG4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lH6Vlh/LupwrG+SnqAY8Sb7/4YxQx9dTM1Gv1+QCdJnX0pCKfB0FUqU//OKGt5mWH 0EdonY6OCv+S5kgQiyWsF7kunPTTdmQdzPDCA/PzC8b8PMpR0QfZNHYALrzf/fNNjI v+bEwYuc0W+ILFB47FgyAQHaVzZ8SG4HCze/ILzg= Original-Received: by lugabout.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2AE93A00DB; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83iq920w4t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:41:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQCAYAAAAf8/9hAAAABHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAAAAI1J REFUOE+lU9ESgCAIg64P1y+ngUdxhl5H8wFbbM0OmUiEhKkCYaZThXCo6KE5sCbA1DDX3genvO4d eBQgEMaM5qy6uWk4SfBYfdu9jvBN9nSVDOKRtwb+I3epboOsOX5pZbJNsBJFvmQQ05YMfieIBnYX FK2N6dOawd97r/e8RjkTLzmMsiVgrAoEugtviCM3v2WzjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Copyright: Copyright 2009 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 34 X-Hashcash: 1:30:100313:eliz@gnu.org::Qqdyxes/DD9MlHT5:0000rwnco X-Hashcash: 1:30:100313:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca::X9NEF2DtIpsOzXPY:000000000000000000000000000000000000aBQgb X-Hashcash: 1:30:100313:emacs-devel@gnu.org::hJkPWACKhmqDYp2C:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000yp5lO X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121912 Archived-At: >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: EZ> As I explained elsewhere, the bidi code is inactive unless the user EZ> customizes a per-buffer variable. Yes, I read that and had it in mind when replying. EZ> So the reasons for not merging into the trunk are not for fear of EZ> totally breaking Emacs, and will also delay publishing as a public EZ> branch. I was, as I hoped you'd notice, trying to give you a reason to publish early and often, rather than waiting ... EZ> Unless someone objects strenuously, I intend to merge all the EZ> current history I have on my local branch, without any rebasing EZ> or similar tricks that futz with the history. Which is exactly what I was hoping to get to see. EZ> I'm still unclear why it makes more sense to have a public branch EZ> than to merge with the trunk. Just to get it out there before the merge. I we cannot convince you to let us see it and test it out now, I suppose there is no reason. :( And to be clear, I am not complaining about your choice to keep it close, just failing to persuade otherwise. :) -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6