From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6390: Should not regexp-quote quote newline? Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:08:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276187311 2711 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2010 16:28:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6390@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 18:28:29 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkcH-00086y-9B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:28:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47022 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMkcG-0004WN-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53652 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMkc5-0004Uo-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkc4-0005hX-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkc4-0005hT-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:28:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkJR-0004UY-KN; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6390.127618612817259 (code B ref 6390); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2010 16:08:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkJE-0004UK-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:08:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkJC-0004UF-Ax for 6390@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:08:47 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21281C00711; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:08:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hase.home (ppp-88-217-113-22.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.113.22]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914561C00369; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:08:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: An INK-LING? Sure -- TAKE one!! Did you BUY any COMMUNIST UNIFORMS?? In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:02:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:09:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37663 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Lennart Borgman writes: >> >>> Would it not be more practical if the result was "a\nb"? >> >> That's exactly what you get. > > ;-) > > "a\\nb" This is a totally different regexp. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."