From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: CHENG Gao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ns-win.el Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:54:12 +0800 Organization: cyberhut.org Message-ID: References: <19651.37838.815906.240014@fencepost.gnu.org> <7seibdzmke.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <1t62wpa8by.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288069442 15372 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2010 05:04:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:04:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 07:04:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAbhY-0004T9-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:04:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAbhY-00079x-7f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:04:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44074 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAbhP-00078U-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAbdj-0001Xm-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PAbdi-0001VG-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAbdf-0003M8-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:59:59 +0200 Original-Received: from 117.88.104.122 ([117.88.104.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:59:59 +0200 Original-Received: from chenggao by 117.88.104.122 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:59:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 117.88.104.122 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xlWMlWqQZT4AB31dP4G09jqhA64= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132119 Archived-At: *On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:25:53 -0400 * Also sprach Glenn Morris : > Oh, and my most important question: how are we supposed to spell > "Nextstep"? We have: > > 2 NEXTSTEP > 1 NExTSTEP > 5 NeXTSTEP > 3 NeXTStep > 58 NeXTstep > 2 NextStep > 58 Nextstep > 9 nextstep According to wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXTSTEP), NEXTSTEP is used at the end of its life. NeXTSTEP is used most commonly by insiders. So maybe choose from them.