From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What's up with apply-partially? Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:05:11 +0800 Message-ID: References: <874mrh5emp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422068749 9906 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2015 03:05:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 24 04:05:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEr2i-0007fb-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:05:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33878 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEr2h-0006qE-9Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34487) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEr2M-0006pv-IM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:05:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEr2F-0006S5-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:05:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]:34286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEr2F-0006Rv-LH; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id kq14so806337pab.0; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:05:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=B3Wfw7SwyxJckfxmnSfTPBDgbcHfdVD9mQ7DlAWDdXI=; b=rxkiQ7g3Z4joJ3ZF70g2s8PrS2Xzd6zr5yVan/XBJ/hqvZPXmL9SW8TVXRbtFdml55 e9AiiBZFTixPcY5Iqwt+RPGmkf4sVY0dyPc53J7Hdl9fj9UTSwwXFfGSFwUz48Nm0lLL ehBeIRf53eZ77uS1ZeVSerSsSg7AukblJfaJ4vqyJ0RV3x+2WEr7wbieoo50++eGRN1L 27PPaiu2yQUpg/XQ25e5jVL/d8Wta7e9x7gpMXysJuQ3Pok/R1ed2Nw8PMuRYNGgUtZr wyMqjguFWJcCoWArnuSWklQ+yaeb/GTSgaqZ+zqbszlNwpyAxNyUWyfV82f8sy1ECw2S mE8w== X-Received: by 10.66.249.226 with SMTP id yx2mr16372235pac.112.1422068718993; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:05:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Shidais-iMac.local ([128.199.230.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qc8sm3204491pdb.86.2015.01.23.19.05.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:05:18 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <874mrh5emp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:14:06 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (OS X 10.10.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181708 Archived-At: On 2015-01-24 06:14 +0800, David Kastrup wrote: > `(closure (t) (&rest args) > (apply ',fun ,@(mapcar (lambda (arg) `',arg) args) args))) I have been wondering this myself. I wonder if it was a workaround from the time when lexical-binding is not activated in subr.el? The implementation does away `append' and is specially handled in cconv-convert so it might actually be more efficient but I am just wondering ;) Leo