From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: happy@vole.com (mr.sparkle) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Holy Wars redux: w3 vs. emacs-w3m Date: 04 Nov 2002 19:41:23 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036458534 8207 80.91.224.249 (5 Nov 2002 01:08:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 01:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188sD3-00027Z-01 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 02:08:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188sEO-0005c7-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 20:10:12 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.online.be!sn-xit-05!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Original-Lines: 18 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:106745 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:3299 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:3299 On Sun, 03 Nov 2002, blackwolf@pcisys.net wrote: > I've been using w3 off-and-on in the past, but since I'm trying to > go far more text-centric on my desktop[1] I'd like to do the little > web browsing that I do from within Emacs. I've downloaded w3 > v4.0pre.47 and have been getting that nasty ``wrong type argument: > stringp, nil'' error[2] that's been mentioned lately. Anyone have > an opinion[3] on W3 vs. emacs-w3m? > > [1] Full-screen xterm running screen, with a Mozilla tab (using the > PWM window manager) as a last resort. > > [2] No, I haven't tried to get a backtrace ... sorry. > > [3] Heh I found w3 to be sloooooow. emacs-w3m is reasonably fast and it renders html nicely. I use emacs-w3m as the browser for html files in dired and I have no complaints so far.