From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pseudovectors initialization Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4FE9643E.6080004@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340702346 8557 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2012 09:19:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:19:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 26 11:19:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SjRvM-0008IB-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:19:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjRvM-0004B9-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjRvG-0004B1-Lu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjRvB-0006Pt-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:18:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:45040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjRvB-0006Pl-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:18:53 -0400 Original-Received: by yenr5 with SMTP id r5so4331269yen.0 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:18:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=KauGD7t9lxAllc2sk7X2vjL93yYxV04aj7s8Okv/oaA=; b=n07ivbu6r9AFlLDTbHH5ZOxjWCah0E6a4XHhYXBQieW+1cZ2uJ5IFdWSvsgYKvWn5k XoT+36Gv8El0cGN9eB9KRwEkyc3RPnifdavWrF3j9hiFQgmqUHjknrBJ3xMpOZN5LQ2O ly70xnZu46nfS+XNKVXO0eJ4HJEE7OUpXLxrr29YV0NFioSyGjaRJKSlyrswAa0S+Xt+ NWLOdc+yJxt3wWk7D3BAwtfPVVr7c9D/Z0/loiWFEMGlf3QxThwfhhYbPM2Yn8L3ZX43 3J9omApB3edxfo4UW9cCI5wxPDov4KZJKhzHJg2Q/bAJ3JzWzmTz1JEvu+NzU5Xf+YR4 9mJA== Original-Received: by 10.50.41.226 with SMTP id i2mr10684076igl.4.1340702331707; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from vulcan.local (c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.215.105.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g5sm1572283ign.4.2012.06.26.02.18.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 37263F0CCAF8; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:17:25 -0500 (CDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4FE9643E.6080004@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:54 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.213.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151174 Archived-At: >>>>> Dmitry Antipov writes: > Windows, frames, processes and terminals are created rarely and tends to > have a long lifetime; so, IMHO, it's reasonable to pay a negligible > performance penalty to simplify initialization, readability and maintenance. > Any objections? Processes get created very frequently on my Emacs. It would be preferable to avoid any assumptions about how Emacs is used. John