From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yves Baumes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to follow the end of *Messages* buffer in Emacs? Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:24:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352586274 15377 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2012 22:24:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 10 23:24:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXJTn-0003Eu-KM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:24:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47186 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXJTe-0002Rh-5D for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:24:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXJTW-0002RE-Ew for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXJTT-0005hB-CO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:24:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:46849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXJTT-0005gB-5m for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so2706414wey.0 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:24:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=A6hLlPHP5VNVuRt4td3WGIeDTh2NsxLJdY0iOggSlWA=; b=l6l0pnhmpY5SHECGIBzYnLX5NfRuAgyjdHx/buk8fO6P4otpyl+uNS6C5ZLUjJOQcD 3rolPcz1DsX7M/4FrK3Z/+f4/PcqZjmDmxtkTNFUtqRuaBIXjEYWXQW6OHkZAJnIDuH5 JgYIXVoTvQCsywPMCmG/W5lFSAGaW7sDbQ904u+yziYGdy6KrnTpOvunTIivkLxBtoci KaUAhKw8fVrp34ltYNP7I/XMaebNh8f//vXvupuhYfe2bU9tLlcQ8hwKW3yw7u1rX6YZ 3G0hV/nzvIA9FcHtzvb7K/QmCq3Yoo1qMqhcNY07Ip4fb3PayVDKK4eYZTaPICzoeuLf QIHw== Original-Received: by 10.216.197.166 with SMTP id t38mr6153179wen.109.1352586262311; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:24:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mac-mini-de-yves-baumes.local.localhost (rke75-2-82-66-91-208.fbx.proxad.net. [82.66.91.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eq2sm4401532wib.1.2012.11.10.14.24.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:24:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:02:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:87637 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > For the moment it should be sufficient if you add your function to > `window-configuration-change-hook' instead of `post-command-hook'. This > should allow you to scroll and edit *Messages* without any problems. In order to correct my previous post. 'message-log-max was set to 100. I've modified it to t - true. As a result (point-max) get higher each time. But the issue is still there. Every time the *Messages* buffer comes back in its window, the cursor is not in the right place. I've tried several attempts and it did not fixed the issue. And it is ok, the initial puropose was to play with GNU Emacs! :-) And I am getting more and more fun actually, believe me or not :-) Regards Yves