From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rainer M Krug Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: From Gnus to mu4e Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:41:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d1yhpsbr.fsf@free.fr> <87lhczyl1p.fsf@free.fr> <87a8tezf7x.fsf@free.fr> <87wpwg3b66.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpwfkdjz.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9nj7pse.fsf@gmx.us> <878u8v3hb2.fsf@free.fr> <87si7367yt.fsf@gmx.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440758505 8322 80.91.229.3 (28 Aug 2015 10:41:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Rasmus Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 12:41:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVH6B-0006W5-K0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:41:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVH6A-0001lT-NT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:41:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVH5y-0001lG-33 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVH5u-0000KG-Qk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:37061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVH5u-0000KC-Lc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfv10 with SMTP id fv10so8043074wic.0 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:41:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=JIX+f+H6Ohnvk8Dr5Q91DEP6WuLpJbHqT+Ur7D+xRjM=; b=JylA1sidtegANnewXYtS+DBzZj8OSVHfWV/w9spIty+bM08XETfb3h1BQjI4/6kTJB Sfa6fZupolqnxeg+gw2a0ri0EeYqaxahoHjlrm7tGu8lMG7XmPTnJQVTGLtNCc/TayJq p594J5cTfK/VslrgN7wdRqiY3uqdwdy3HsAxU8ABnrXC8ka3JSo9Mma+Hgt09PG6kRtx 9TxLyz9okwRAZsFWBb2iEQ8a0S8vTMt+iwSARuI99fIqinEJtBZJNY1VRd9ASXM6sMqv a/OnWbRrOBeEBKF1BQQr7w78UUzCFYjVfz4fEePT3u0L7IY2QYKfssbAMqlp5Xx52fPB L53Q== X-Received: by 10.194.114.37 with SMTP id jd5mr10453927wjb.34.1440758474108; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Rainers-MacBook-Pro.local (arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net. [88.186.171.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm3544896wjy.16.2015.08.28.03.41.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:41:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87si7367yt.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:08:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.182 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:106894 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rasmus writes: > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> Yes - offlineimap is running permanently, but ony checks in specific >> intervalls - the rest of the time it is idling, but can, if told so, >> keep the connection open (and this is what I do in my config). > > This is incorrect. > > In email technology, IDLE is an IMAP feature described in RFC 2177 > that allows a client to indicate to the server that it is ready to > accept real-time notifications. (Wikipedia) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^=20 Sorry - mixed it up with running offlineimap in daemon mode with checking periodically, controlled by the "autorefresh" option. Didn't know about the idlefolders option. > > What you are talking about is polling; like a chron job. This is > inefficient. Why is it inefficient, and inefficient in regards to local resources, time, bandwidth? The connections are kept open, and it is just polling every few minutes. With idlefolders, offlineimap is permanently listening to the server? Rainer > > Rasmus =2D-=20 Rainer M. Krug email: Rainerkrugsde PGP: 0x0F52F982 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV4DrHAAoJENvXNx4PUvmCJAEIAN04L8e6bGmFE84dERP1O/CJ 2m8JPFMCYbt/tNyBfWS+jnfAAsYRnvBg+W+r0JXmcuVKg9HI0mi32e+klxBiBybZ 25P6dQV5t827pHplTCU+9StFSXeee95OWiQGBh200qp03eTKzdu8GL2DyD259xTa Ua1/DNRQmekJSEvEZXZS49l7q8AibsEQstolirwrjjBzur24/Ao+4NLAwLinRClg PlAIXT4JHK8KBqNQVfn7T5+Ew+3m/g31ttpAbZ0nQKcy9xpsag8sePF9vHHVGD+g Fw8mJxf8jGbCXFk6N/YCqA/f2ZKYFhoO6ZrVKh9LCVJzLuHZO0JBZanCkL8dSTI= =I2M8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--