From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: bug in org-habits Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:26:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871tc83p01.fsf@flynn.nichework.com> <84io5j1k5h.fsf@gmail.com> <84611j19hk.fsf@gmail.com> <5638C2A1.2090801@iancu.ch> <87h9l32gfc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1vq3mh4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mh23iw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u6eu5wg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <315DDEDC-1BD9-4680-A8C8-B36821EB931C@gmail.com> <874mh2u2w0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ziytyl3z.fsf@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu4dU-0001E2-HN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:26:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu4dQ-0008K6-Iu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:26:24 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]:33477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu4dQ-0008K2-Es for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:26:20 -0500 Received: by ykdv3 with SMTP id v3so3864520ykd.0 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:26:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ziytyl3z.fsf@free.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:01:20 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Bastien Guerry writes: > I think Achim's points above are very valid, and the flexibility offered by > the option above should be very carefully examined. I spoke to Nicolas directly and he mentioned that a goal for syntax regularity is to make it possible to reliably read and manipulate Org files outside of Emacs. For this I *am* willing to give up order independence of PROPERTIES. Having a customization option would needlessly increases the number of possibilities external processors must consider, and so I retract my request. John