From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:47:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <837fl2qzs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83610ikvto.fsf@gnu.org> <83bna6ipn7.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpsuh6cr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtqgtrl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449283180 7653 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2015 02:39:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 02:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, Per =?utf-8?Q?Starb=C3=A4ck?= , rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 03:39:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a52l2-0007JQ-1L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 03:39:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a52l1-0001bF-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a52kx-0001b6-Ql for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:39:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a52kw-00071H-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]:33751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a52kt-0006zF-1Q; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:39:23 -0500 Original-Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so98090630pab.0; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:39:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=mMlnpk1tRyboY6wa0dk6T4NKn4erE8KlHsTCZAnrWRA=; b=ZXn3Eqi9LCzjPe3waFR5kemB5l8l3Uwuc8X2HoKJ1W1GhHWUbUew/hvXgSyhSzmMSt Jr+wvla1i8t3TZFeLcDM2dhAbQcbNmzyCUWax1c4b17j4RHS61Sa1GI+x/X2xspun3Ww ZqXuOjg1eoeAL+McBAUmfHCCbCp8q9K9fOZscWxOQut28j2Oww4eAGnxRmDSIZEa57Yq AKSW05Y5AhVDFXGIl3NMJ70uzUG1x7kTLFr0af7i0jltfDi6KZTDuGK7PanAuTzZ6rhO cldRhupn9Gfh2OYsHatsbmwqx4uM4XBPRoQLwG/mlE0u04bnqj4VAea3dtiLwi4IqfcC WHJw== X-Received: by 10.67.5.2 with SMTP id ci2mr26227391pad.47.1449283161987; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:39:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm19692876pfb.78.2015.12.04.18.39.19 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:39:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E28FA10C64CF3; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:39:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83mvtqgtrl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:42:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Per =?utf-8?Q?Starb=C3=A4c?= =?utf-8?Q?k?= , jwiegley@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195913 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > For now, the release is still so far away that any difference between these > 2 alternatives is indiscernible, IMO. Let's not assume that the next release is quite that far away. I would like to see it completed by June 2016, if that is possible. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2