From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2375: 23.0.90; ^ in gnus summary buffer does not work in the nextstep build Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:31:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20090218182725.7F0B564571F@ate.maierh> <87wq3mp9dd.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453419207 20520 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2016 23:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Harald Maier , Stefan Monnier , 2375@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 22 00:33:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOj2-0007r5-9O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:33:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOj1-0000iM-Lk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:33:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOiw-0000i9-1z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOis-0002MS-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOir-0002M7-SU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOir-00015L-LB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2375 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2375-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2375.14534191364114 (code B ref 2375); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2375) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2016 23:32:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56853 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOi4-00014D-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:33653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOhz-00013x-Iq for 2375@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:32:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 123so194169268wmz.0 for <2375@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:32:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=meizPu03rjwjSmUtN/xa0YOC456+mHpF7da08/nYAlQ=; b=oS6z8JoAfTIJcB6ofvNNPvYy40sJwf3N3DMkoxqZ3E7QYw909MhZ5BLUijQ3N0GI6D QmO/9l/p0JA67Bn00fXXJj0Xwl6CDNmElf+Tr1ZSjOTNHhchgx37iJzBG/fPsz01Iw51 FXdP8XEHwJ9dTWiQg9ToC2pTizDQsLseOIvIBV3QysuvYnMthUwMUg+GC/UF0xg5D6TE 1IaYJ1628UHLxIPL/jb7TSjIzimQqGgO4QxqYTuZhK46x9MC6NOEc0ZioYK+BJ1K8lm+ BFb5wsKwAw8mbx/l1wJivClSnBIuOL5siK+FiMK5tvFUF8REugliBgaqSPvYa2HT++hJ bX8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=meizPu03rjwjSmUtN/xa0YOC456+mHpF7da08/nYAlQ=; b=fLFL9zjoBrC5wve0jOmM3CtLTJ7dCa+3yTCoztaYVLVYm4rGm365n8A6D+RZTv+1C8 oNEFCgYNKB6U2jq5ektpCVdlNY2ivH9+BGqLbDQX0u2gMZl0T+tO622MiqTDvftgEqy8 /h5LT4g3iIOsnTwPzKIMBLOuz4uufnV6A0jKRZDafIjHati0UPZNfxNwOHZDN0Rpy5sb GKPhWOvpfWdVzBgAuaBOw+B6a1w+5UB/UDqC6POxtkf5TxhEeV0vWcxePq+IS18I5EF/ 9Yuuxs+V3EnvZL8s8IiX58XSKxTzuAViH02RCCsAQPaTAycRSp4pP96gdPxndRGTrYSf x22w== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORAhf9C3ybW2j7ovWN6YpYtJ7AgQffHi28H5kEJeCLsyb2lQKifM9lfEMh6H3n5aQ== X-Received: by 10.28.175.209 with SMTP id y200mr240401wme.70.1453419121611; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:32:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from galloway.idiocy.org (d.0.d.3.7.a.e.3.0.f.2.b.f.2.5.7.9.2.1.8.8.f.3.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:752f:b2f0:3ea7:3d0d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i196sm398444wmf.23.2016.01.21.15.32.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:32:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wq3mp9dd.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:18:38 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111841 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >> It still leaves open the question of whether it would be desirable to >> shortcut this so that pressing ^ in the Gnus summary immediately calls >> the Gnus command, without having to press a subsequent SPC. > > I think that would be confusing. When you have a keyboard with dead > keys, you're used to them being just composing characters that needs > another keystroke for something to happen. So `^ SPC' is fine in Gnus. > > The patch in question seems to give visual feedback that you're in the > middle of a composing character, which might be nice, though. > > But is this still an issue five years later? :-) It looks like the bug is fixed, so unless anyone disagrees I'll close this bug in a few days. -- Alan Third